After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies are now reviving these types of systems. From lie detection tools analyzed at the line to a program for verifying documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of technologies is being used by asylum applications. This article explores how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. That reveals how asylum seekers will be transformed into forced hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and keep up with unforeseen tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their capacity to browse these devices and to go after their legal right for proper protection.

It also displays how these types of technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They assist in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by simply hindering all of them from interacting with the programs of security. It further states that studies of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight into the disciplinary mechanisms of them technologies, in which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects whom are self-disciplined by their reliance on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal expertise, the article argues that these systems have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double result: when they assist to expedite the asylum procedure, they also produce it difficult designed for refugees to navigate these kinds of systems. They may be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to bogus decisions manufactured by non-governmental stars, and www.ascella-llc.com/asylum-procedure-advice ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their conditions. Moreover, that they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.